|
Use of Technology in WV Career
Development Events
The use of all electronic devices; including but not
limited to cell phones, BlackBerries, PDAs, MP3 players, programmable
calculators; are prohibited during all West Virginia Career Development
Events. If an event requires the use of calculators, the event
coordinator will provide exact specifications on the type(s) of devices
(including functions) that will be permitted.
Failure to comply with this
regulation will result in the elimination of the entire team from
competition. A letter will be sent to the school principal and
superintendent by the state staff detailing the reasons for the dismissal.
Use of Reference
Materials in WV Career Development Events
Students participating in West
Virginia Career Development Events are prohibited from bringing reference
materials, paper, and/or other aids into the contest area unless the
materials/aids are specified by the event coordinators in the official
rules and regulations. The exception, all students are permitted to
use a standard clipboard. Cover sheets will be provided for all
contestants in all contests. Contestants participating in contests
with oral reasons will be provided two sheets of unlined white paper to
take notes.
Failure to comply with this
regulation will result in the elimination of the entire team from
competition. A letter will be sent to the school principal and
superintendent by the state staff detailing the reasons for the dismissal.
Teams of Less than
Three Members
Students may compete in a Career
Development Event even if their school does not have a full team (3 or 4
members). If a school has less than 3 team members, the students are
only eligible for individual awards. A school may enter only one team
(maximum 4 students) per event. (Passed 11/6/2006)
Poultry
I. PURPOSE
The Poultry Career
Development Event stimulates learning activities relative to production
and management, processing, marketing, and consumption of poultry
products.
II. EVENT RULES
-
Team Make-up- Teams may consist of three or four members. Team
ranking is determined by combining the scores of the top three
students from each team. Teams that for whatever reason have
fewer than three members are not eligible for team awards, but
students may receive individual awards.
-
Humane Treatment of Live Animals: All live animals must be treated
with the utmost care and respect. Violation of this rule will
automatically disqualify an offending team member from the event.
The supervision, interpretation, and enforcement of this rule will be
the responsibility of the Event Superintendent and/or their designee.
- Each team will
receive computer scan sheets from contest superintendent.
- Each participant
will have ten minutes to complete each class. A warning signal will
inform the participants when time expires for each class. Participants
will have one minute to move from class to class.
- A reliable
technique will be used to identify the poultry and poultry products in
the placing, selection, grading, and identification classes.
III. EVENT FORMAT
A. EQUIPMENT
Materials students
must provide- Each participant must have two sharpened No. 2
pencils, and an electronic calculator. Calculators that are permissible
for use in this event are those that are battery operated,
non-programmable, and silent. A calculator may have
the following
functions- addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, equals,
percent, square root, +/- key, and one memory register. Calculators that
are capable of storing equations, definitions, and/or terms are not
permitted. Participants attempting to use unauthorized calculators will
be disqualified.
B. TEAM ACTIVITY
The team activity and
the written examination will be administered at the beginning of the
event. All members of a team will work collaboratively to perform an
activity related to poultry production and management. Team members will
observe and/or be provided information about a poultry industry
situation or problem scenario. Team members will then answer 15
questions related to the information gained from the situation/scenario
and from reference materials studied in preparation for the career
development event. The team activity may require participants to use
information technology that is appropriate for the poultry industry
(e.g., computers, software applications, Internet resources, and related
technologies).
| Class #
|
Points |
| 13. Team Activity |
200 |
C. INDIVIDUAL
ACTIVITIES
Live Poultry
-
Each participant will select the four best
potential broiler breeders from a class of eight meat-type cockerels
or pullets. The keep-cull birds may or may not have trimmed beaks.
Each participant will be permitted to “handle” the birds, so long as
the birds are inspected in a professional and humane manner. Following
this class, the participant will have ten minutes to prepare oral
reasons for presentation.
-
Each participant will present oral reasons for
the selection class of broiler breeders. Participants will have
two minutes to present their oral reasons. Reasons should include
current USDA and poultry industry terminology and standards.
-
Each participant will place a class of four past
production egg-type hens. The birds will be Single-Comb White
Leghorns, or commercial strains of Leghorn-type (inbred cross).
The birds may or may not have trimmed beaks. Each participant will be
permitted to “handle” the birds, so long as the birds are inspected in
a professional and humane manner.
| Class# |
Points |
| 1. Eight meat-type cockerels or pullets for
broiler breeder selection |
50 |
| 2. Four past production egg-type hens for placing |
50 |
| 3. Oral reasons for Class 1 |
50 |
Ready-to-Cook Poultry
-
Each participant will grade a class of ten
ready-to cook chicken and/or turkey carcasses and/or parts. Criteria
for grading will be from USDA standards for chicken carcasses weighing
two pounds to six pounds and for turkey carcasses weighing six pounds
to sixteen pounds. The USDA quality grades will be A, B, and C.
Participants may not touch any carcass or part; doing so will result
in disqualification. If used, the shackle holding a carcass may be
rotated to show the entire carcass.
-
Each participant will place a class of four
ready-to-cook turkey carcasses. Criteria for placing will be from USDA
standards for turkey carcasses weighing six pounds to sixteen pounds.
Participants may not touch any carcass; doing so will result in
disqualification. If used, the shackle holding a carcass may be
rotated to show the entire carcass. Following this class, participants
will have ten minutes to prepare oral reasons for presentation.
-
Each participant will present oral reasons for
their placing of the class of ready-to-cook turkey carcasses.
Participants will have two minutes to present their reasons.
Reasons should include current USDA and poultry industry terminology
and standards.
| Class# |
Points |
| 4. Ten ready to cook
chicken and/or turkey carcasses and/or/parts |
50 |
| 5. Four turkey carcasses for
placing |
50 |
| 6. Oral reasons for Class 5 |
50 |
Shell Eggs
-
Each participant will grade a class of ten white
(or white-tint)-shelled eggs. Criteria for grading will be from USDA
standards for interior quality of market eggs. The USDA quality grades
will be AA, A, B, and Loss. Participants must candle the eggs to
determine the appropriate USDA quality grade, but improper handling of
eggs will result in disqualification.
-
Each participant will grade a
class of ten shell eggs. Criteria for grading will be derived from
USDA standards for exterior quality of market eggs. The USDA quality
grades will be AA/A, B and NG (nongradable). Criteria for grading may
include decisions related to the following quality factors (i.e.,
defects): Soundness (unbroken, check, dented check or leaker); Stains
(slight/moderate stain or prominent stain); Adhering Dirt or Foreign
Material; Egg Shape (approximately normal shape, unusual or decidedly
misshapen); Shell Texture (shell faulty in soundness and strength,
large calcium deposits or pronounced ridges); Shell Thickness
(pronounced thin spots); No Defect.
-
Each participant
will determine written factors for the grading of the exterior chicken
eggs. The written factors will relate to the criteria used for grading
exterior quality of eggs.
| Class# |
Points |
| 7. Ten white-shelled eggs for interior quality
grading |
50 |
| 8. Ten chicken eggs for exterior quality grading |
50 |
| 9. Evaluation criteria for Class 8 |
50 |
Further Processed
Poultry
-
Each participant will
determine written quality factors for a class of ten further-processed
poultry meat products (e.g., precooked, coated chicken meat patties,
tenders, nuggets or wings). Criteria for evaluation will include
coating defects (void and color), appropriateness of shape
(inconsistent shape and broken), inconsistent size,
clusters/marriages, miscuts in wings (miscut and broken) and evidence
of feathers or foreign material. Participants may not touch any
product; doing so will result in disqualification.
-
Each participant will identify ten poultry
parts. Poultry parts to be identified will be randomly selected and
consistent with those used in the chicken processing and merchandising
industries. The participant may not touch any part; doing so will
result in disqualification.
| Class# |
Points |
|
10. Ten
further-processed poultry meat products (e.g., precooked, breaded
chicken meat patties, tenders, or nuggets) for factors
|
100 |
| 11. Ten poultry carcass parts for identification
|
50 |
Poultry Management
Written Exam
-
The written examination and the team activity
will be administered at the beginning of the event.
-
Each participant will complete a thirty-item
written examination on poultry production and management. Five
or more items will require mathematical calculations. Examination
items will be developed from information found in the references (see
Section VIII).
| Class# |
Points |
| 12. Written Examination |
150 |
Point Value of 12
Classes/Individual 750 (Total Possible Individual Points)
Point Value of 13
Classes (including the Team Activity) 2,450 (Total Possible Team Points)
V. TIEBREAKERS
If ties occur, the
following events will be used in order to determine the ranking of award
recipients:
-
Written Management Exam
-
Live Birds Evaluation
VI. REFERENCES
This list of
references is not intended to be inclusive. Other sources may be
utilized and teachers are encouraged to make use of the very best
instructional materials available. The following list contains
references that may prove helpful during event preparation.
*Available from
Instructional Materials Service (IMS), Texas
A&M University, 2588 TAMUS,College Station,TX 77843-
2588 (Phone: 979-845-6601; FAX: 979-845-6608;
ims@tamu.edu;
http://www-ims.tamu.edu/).
-
Poultry Science Manual for National FFA Career
Development Events.* (Fourth Edition) (IMS Catalog #0418-4)
For
even-number years (2002 and 2004) examination items will be derived from
this reference except for those sections related to poultry anatomy,
physiology, health, waste, environment, and marketing.
For odd-number
years (2001, 2003,and 2005) examination items will be derived from this
reference except for those sections related to poultry hatcheries,
broiler breeders, market broilers, and turkey breeders.
(Note: Reference b., c., and d. are additional sources for the
examination items.)
-
Evaluation of Precooked, Breaded Chicken
Patties* (14 color slides with four-page script) (IMS Catalog #5140)
c.
Poultry Grading Manual - Agriculture Handbook Number 31* (latest USDA
edition) (IMS Catalog #0414)
d.
Egg-Grading Manual - Agriculture Handbook Number 75* (latest USDA
edition) (IMS Catalog #0417)
The Hormel Computing Slide is available
through the National FFA Agriculture Education Resources Catalog, Item #HCSS,
$11.95 each, 5 or more $11.25 each.
VII. EXAMPLES
SCORING FORMAT SUMMARY
See
http://www.ffa.org/documents/cde_poultry.pdf for details of the
"Scoring Format Summary"
|